Teaser TuesdaysTeaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:

  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!

Today’s Teaser:

The cook had a crise de nerfs at six and another at nine; they came on so regularly that one could have told the time by them. She would flop down on the dustbin, begin weeping hysterically, and cry that never, no, never had she thought to come to such a life as this; her nerves would not stand it; she had studied music at Vienna; she had a bedridden husband to support, etc etc.”
- George Orwell, Down and Out in Paris and London

What book are you reading this week? Feel free to share in the comments!

  • Reddit
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

Friday Pieces – William Shakespeare: Monsieur Love

by Charlotte on February 12, 2010

Valentine’s Day – that great Victorian bastion of mawkish sentimentality – is just around the corner. As I’m no great writer of love poetry, I thought we’d bring in one of the best English poets for our Friday Piece this week.

But first, a note from our sponsor:

Shakespeare’s sonnets do not mean what you think they mean.

When I was at Columbia, I took a class with one of the foremost Shakespeare scholars living: David Scott Kastan. Kastan was on a mission to save couples from putting any of the sonnets (I’m looking at you, 116, 18, and 130!) on their wedding invitations. Why? Because they don’t mean what you think they mean.

Take sonnet 18, for example. “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day…” Most people read this as the poet telling his love that poetry renders her current perfections in verse, and that the poem preserves these for posterity.

However, if you take the original Elizabethan meanings of some of the words, and their juxtaposition with each other, you’ll come up with the meaning that while the poet’s lover is a mercurial and moody one who has only borrowed her – his? – beauty from nature for a short time (meaning the poet will have to change course and dump her soon), she will even so remain in his poetry what she was not in life: beautiful and sweet-tempered.

Do you really want that on your wedding invitation?

(If anyone’s interested in a more thorough analysis, I can post one. I’m not sure how long your patience for poetry lasts. Mine’s lease hath all too short a date.)

So, try your hand at this one!

Sonnet 23 was suggested to me last night by my muse as being perfect for today. It does, in fact, deal with love. And also – in a round about manner of speaking – with writing. But like the sonnet above, it probably does not mean what a first cursory reading would suggest. So! Give it a go.

As with most textual criticism, there are no right or wrong answers (and Shakespeare would probably have a hearty laugh at all the Serious Scholars who analyze with minute detail what he wrote in order to make a pound down at the local playhouse) – so don’t be afraid to try!

Analyzing other people’s writing – especially things that might be unfamiliar to you for some reason – will help you get better at spotting things about your own.

Sonnet 23

As an unperfect actor on the stage
Who with his fear is put besides his part,
Or some fierce thing replete with too much rage,
Whose strength’s abundance weakens his own heart.
So I, for fear of trust, forget to say
The perfect ceremony of love’s rite,
And in mine own love’s strength seem to decay,
O’ercharged with burden of mine own love’s might.
O, let my books be then the eloquence
And dumb presagers of my speaking breast,
Who plead for love and look for recompense
More than that tongue that more hath more express’d.
O, learn to read what silent love hath writ:
To hear with eyes belongs to love’s fine wit.

  • Reddit
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Thursday Inspiration: The Direct Line Problem

by Charlotte on February 11, 2010

Pacing in adventure or fantasy novels (and what novel doesn’t have some sort of element of either?) is notoriously tricky – especially when your character’s quest is ostensibly a Point A to Point B journey. While it’s tempting to just throw a bunch of obstacles or roadblocks at your protagonist, too many try-fail cycles bog down your plot and piss off your reader. Orson Scott Card calls this the “direct line problem.”

Fortunately, there’s a way to circumvent this problem altogether. Can you introduce tension in your characters’ motivations, rather than in their physical reality?

Rather you have the conflicting objectives cycle. Things that are worth doing, that need doing, which sidetrack the characters and distract them from their quest. Then there’s the This Can’t Happen trick (Gandalf dies?) that “changes everything” and causes the group to reconfigure (again, some of them being distracted as they go off on sub-quests).

Find the rest at Orson’s site. Fantastic.

  • Reddit
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

In This Episode

  • Fictionette news
  • Update on “The Writing Process” series
  • How (and why) to write even when you’re lacking in inspiration or motivation.
  • Exercise of the week!

Inspiration Is Not Enough

It is so easy to become reliant on bursts of “inspiration” to motivate us to write. For many of us, these little bursts represent the only time we actually dedicate to the craft.

If this describes you, it’s not your fault. Movies, TV, and sometimes even writers themselves perpetuate the myth (yes, another one!) that writers only work to inspiration. That they either sit down every night full-bore with juices flowing, or they’re seized by a sudden inspiration, write the Great American Novel in one go, and can come right back to the art 10 years later when the Muse grabs them again.

It doesn’t happen like that, however. All the writers I’ve known or read who actually make a career or even a long-term hobby out of writing put something down on paper every day. They. Write. Every. Day.

The same goes for any creative work. Do something every day. Use it or lose it. More tips and good stuff about how to actually do that in the ‘cast. :)

Links

When You’re Not Inspired – Elizabeth Spann Craig talks about what to do when your muse is on holiday.
First, Care. – Merlin Mann on the one prerequisite for doing your best work.
Neil Gaiman – Neil’s journal provides great insight into his working world. Apparently he’s mastered the art of writing anywhere. He’s had to.

Exercise of the Week

This time, it’s about connecting with your inspiration and making your dialogue do the heavy lifting.

Part 1a – Muse Awhile.

Meditate or sit quietly for a little while. As you’re sitting quietly, ask your Muse (or whatever you call him/her/it) if there’s anything you can do to make your mental space more inviting. Ask if there’s anything keeping her from bringing inspiration and motivation into your life. Don’t argue or try to come up with an implementation plan for what she says. Just… be.

Part 1b – When you’re not inspired…

Read Elizabeth’s post about what to do When You’re Not Inspired. Then see if you can come up with other writing-related things to do when your Muse takes a holiday. This will become your go-to action plan for those times.

Part 2- Hard-working Dialogue.

One of the most common pitfalls for new writers is providing unnecessary third-person “editorial” detail. They jam in all their character descriptions and exposition straight away, leaving the following dialogue flat and flabby. This makes for a sluggish story with a rather boring beginning. NOT good.

This week, write a 500-600 word scene between two characters. Provide as little third-person narration as possible. Instead, make the dialogue convey the characters’ ages, histories, and emotions. By the end of the dialogue, we should have a good idea of who the characters are and their relationship to each other. (Subject matter is up to you.)

If you need a model, take a look at Hemingway’s Hills Like White Elephants or last week’s Friday Piece, Sunday, 10:03.

I’d love to see what you’ve written! You can email me at charlotte [at] fictionette.org or post in the comments. Happy writing! :)

  • Reddit
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Friday Pieces: Sunday, 10:03

by Charlotte on February 5, 2010

Welcome back to the Friday Pieces!

This week’s piece is a flash fiction called Sunday, 10:03. (Flash fiction is a very short piece of finished fiction – usually under 1000 words. This one clocks in at a meager 524.)

I wrote this piece as an experiment in economy. My goal was to give the reader a crystal clear idea of characters, their history, and their motivations without actually saying anything about the characters, history, or their motivations.

The name “Nathan” for the male character was an unconscious choice. I’ve tried to change it since, but haven’t found anything that suits him quite as well.

Questions to Ask

What clues can you pick up about the personality and motivations of these characters from the dialogue?

What backstory do you construct for them in your mind? Are they married? Dating? Just friends? Where do they live? How old are they?

Most importantly: In your own pieces, can you let the dialogue, props, and scene elements do more of the heavy lifting? How much exposition can you cut and still convey the same information?

Feel free to post your answers or thoughts in the comments section!

Sunday, 10:03

“So anyway, that’s what I’m going to read tonight at the conference. That and… well, maybe the other one as well. Depends on the audience.”

She sat at the kitchen table looking at Nathan. He was half buried in the Times as usual: One slippered foot extended to rest on a pile of magazines on the coffee table.

“It doesn’t have an ending.”

“What do you mean?”

“He gets off the train? And she just stands there?”

“It’s an atmospheric thing. The action is in her mind — and in the reader’s. They supply the ending.”

He shifted, sinking deeper into the piled cushions, and held his other foot up — the long planes of his foot flexing as the faded plaid slipper dangled from his big toe.

She hated those slippers.

“Where’d you get those women from?”

“Like… how’d I imagine them?”

“Yeah.”

“I saw both of them. The woman with the bag when I was 12. My grandmother was in the hospital, and my aunt brought me into the city to see her.”

“And you took the subway back to Penn.”

“Yeah.”

“And the other woman?”

“I was in a fiction workshop at Columbia. On my way home from class one night there was this woman in a blue dress. With a much older man. She looked young and alone. I… well, I just remembered her.”

“For 6 years? And 13, for the bag woman?”

Her eyes narrowed. “Yeah.”

He wasn’t looking at her, but at the cat, who — disturbed from his morning nap by the conversation — jumped down off the sunny windowsill and padded noiselessly away towards the relative safety of the bedroom.

“Wait a minute. How do you remember all this?”

“I don’t remember everybody I’ve ever seen. I have to be in a certain mood.”

“What mood?”

“Well… generative. Like — I have to be primed to write.”

“That doesn’t make sense.”

“It’s a writer thing. Writers don’t make sense.”

He shrugged and turned back to his coffee and newspaper.

“Nate?”

“Yeah?” The pages rustled as he flipped past the movie reviews and the crossword to the business section.

“Do I make sense?”

“You’re a writer, aren’t you?”

“Well…”

A golden leaf fluttered down from the tree outside. She noticed it turn and glide and disappear below the casement.

“Look. You come home and you scribble stuff on random post-its and you drink obscene amounts of tea—”

“Look who’s talking!”

“—Obscene amounts of tea, and then you get up in the middle of the night and disappear and… Well. It’s either a woman thing or a writer thing. And God help me if it’s a woman thing.”

She turned back to the laptop in silence.

“You want me to go away, don’t you?”

“What?”

“You’ve said you can’t write when I’m around.”

“No, I… want you here.”

The words sounded dead — stillborn in the pause between them and unconvincing. Not at all what she’d intended.

Nathan took another sip of coffee, picked up his newspaper, and followed the cat into the bedroom.

  • Reddit
  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

The Writing Process: Historical Research

February 4, 2010

Our series on the writing process continues with… Research! Historical research, to be exact. This is one of the topics that strikes fear into the hearts of many writers, and it simply doesn’t have to. This post in the ongoing series is over at Mystery Writing Is Murder. Elizabeth Spann Craig’s blog is one of [...]

Read the full article →

Thursday Inspiration: Meet The Elements

January 28, 2010

They Might Be Giants is an alt-rock band best-known for their song Istanbul (Not Constantinople). (Cool kids know them for more than that song, but I’m not a cool kid. And OMG… did they really record that song 20 years ago?) They’re also a tremendous example of a band that plays music outside their genre. [...]

Read the full article →

Fictionette WriteCast Episode 5 – A Perfect Brainstorm!

January 17, 2010

In This Episode Fictionette news A new series! “The Writing Process” Our first topic? Brainstorming. Exercise of the week! Our new series on the writing process begins at the beginning – with the brainstorming! A bit of brainstorming now can save you tons of rewriting and revision work in the future. There are two main [...]

Read the full article →

Thursday Inspiration – Take Courage

January 14, 2010

Take Courage. This has been my desktop wallpaper, on and off, for some time. Take a look at it. Not only for the message… but for what’s behind it. Inspiration: Who was this sign originally made by? When? For what purpose? Who was it intended to encourage? Musings, writings, meanderings encouraged.

Read the full article →

Vlog – Empathy in Writing

January 13, 2010

Empathy in Writing One of the most completely overlooked aspects of character development in modern fiction is backstory. Not just where your characters came from and who their parents were, etc, but what their emotional life has been like. What events and beliefs shaped them and led to their present circumstances. An example. Take Harry [...]

Read the full article →
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes